Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Chickasaw
7,210
SOCIAL INDEX
69.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
128th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Spain Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,142,843 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to an increase of 26.6 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,933 compared to $36,475, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($113,815 compared to $85,356, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,752 compared to $77,929, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,540 compared to $53,732, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,933 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $113,815 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $92,732 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,092 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,750 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,815 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,560 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,752 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,051 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,540 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 34.2%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.8%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.7% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.1%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.58%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 85.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 30.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 88.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.7%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Average 93.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |