Immigrants from Netherlands vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,016,019 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Netherlands communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Netherlands within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Netherlands corresponds to an increase of 60.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,458 compared to $36,475, a difference of 38.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,982 compared to $82,193, a difference of 36.2%), and median household income ($94,411 compared to $70,005, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,592 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.5%), and median female earnings ($41,870 compared to $34,414, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.1%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 72.5%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.7%).