Canadian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Canadian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Canadians
Chickasaw
7,303
SOCIAL INDEX
70.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
123rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Canadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,656,953 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.784% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 784.3 Chickasaw.
Canadian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.2%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $36,475, a difference of 25.7%), and median household income ($87,769 compared to $70,005, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $34,414, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.8%).
Income Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,858 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,597 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,769 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,911 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,286 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,724 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,336 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,625 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,560 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,230 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Canadian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.0%).
Poverty Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Canadian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Canadian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
Canadian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Canadian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.6%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.50%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Canadian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.1%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Canadian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.9%).
Disability Metric | Canadian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |