Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,492,422 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $50,914, a difference of 39.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $111,454, a difference of 32.8%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,602, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,737, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $64,298, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 49.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 95.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 46.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.9%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 68.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 66.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%).