Chippewa vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,740,542 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.952. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.177% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 177.4 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,132, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $56,768, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $79,956, a difference of 0.060%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,690, a difference of 0.16%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $40,193, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 29.5%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.1%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 67.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).