Chippewa vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,630,612 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $47,284, a difference of 29.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,053, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $100,435, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $49,267, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,060, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 87.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 65.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.30%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.4%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.1%).