Chippewa vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,518,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $52,074, a difference of 42.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $96,490, a difference of 36.8%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $118,440, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,739, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $43,308, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.0%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.7%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 85.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 44.3%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (62.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 69.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.9%).