Chippewa vs American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,877,629 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Americans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 43.9 Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 11.5%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $50,761, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $90,536, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,777, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $55,527, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $48,860, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.8%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 44.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.9%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.7%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), female disability (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.2%).