Chippewa vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,758,122 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,663, a difference of 24.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,536, a difference of 23.3%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $86,418, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,379, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $60,967, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 60.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 56.9%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 101.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 61.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.5%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 76.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 8.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%).