Chippewa vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Czechs
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,466,934 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Czechs.
Chippewa vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,507, a difference of 23.3%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $86,164, a difference of 22.2%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $56,546, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,421, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,992, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,244, a difference of 13.7%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 29.2% |
Chippewa vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.2%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 51.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.9%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chippewa vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 75.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chippewa vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Chippewa vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 39.6%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Excellent 30.5% |
Chippewa vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chippewa vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chippewa vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.4%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Czech |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |