Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Guamanians/Chamorros

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,034,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Guamanians/Chamorros.
Chippewa Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $86,255, a difference of 22.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $101,170, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $63,187, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,717, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,423, a difference of 13.6%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income
Income MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$41,678
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Fair
$101,061
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Good
$86,255
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Fair
$45,933
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Fair
$53,661
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Poor
$38,717
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$53,423
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Fair
$93,569
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Good
$101,170
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$63,187
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Fair
26.0%

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.0%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.1%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Average
11.7%

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 71.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.58%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
38.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.6%

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
66.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
29.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Average
31.6%

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
60.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.1%

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
43.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Chippewa vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability
Disability MetricChippewaGuamanian/Chamorro
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%