Chippewa vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,241,859 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $54,159, a difference of 47.8%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $99,813, a difference of 41.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $117,930, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,571, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $44,366, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 60.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 58.0%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 85.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.2%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 70.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 42.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%).