Chippewa vs Croatian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Croatian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Croatians

Fair
Excellent
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,930
SOCIAL INDEX
86.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
37th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Croatian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,085,569 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Croatians.
Chippewa Integration in Croatian Communities

Chippewa vs Croatian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $47,742, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $108,383, a difference of 29.1%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $59,715, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,662, a difference of 9.9%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,993, a difference of 17.1%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Income
Income MetricChippewaCroatian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$47,742
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$111,370
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$90,685
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$49,724
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$59,715
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$40,993
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Fair
$51,662
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$102,414
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$108,383
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$63,225
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
29.0%

Chippewa vs Croatian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 53.4%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 53.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.9%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 24.4%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaCroatian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
15.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.6%

Chippewa vs Croatian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 77.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaCroatian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Chippewa vs Croatian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaCroatian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
41.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.6%

Chippewa vs Croatian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.2%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.3%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaCroatian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Excellent
30.2%

Chippewa vs Croatian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaCroatian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
6.5%

Chippewa vs Croatian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaCroatian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
40.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Chippewa vs Croatian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.1%).
Chippewa vs Croatian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaCroatian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%