Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Immigrants from Bahamas

Fair
Tragic
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,864,295 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.885. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 40.6 Immigrants from Bahamas.
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $76,910, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $45,793, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,027, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $83,177, a difference of 0.92%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,861, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Income
Income MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$37,193
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$84,732
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$71,349
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$39,861
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$45,176
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$35,027
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$45,793
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$76,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$83,177
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$53,174
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
21.1%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 21.2%), single female poverty (26.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.86%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.8%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.1%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
82.3%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
41.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
40.1%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.51%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.0%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
52.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.3%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
90.2%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
42.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
33.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.9%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.42%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bahamas Disability
Disability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Bahamas
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.5%