Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Fair
Poor
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,635,756 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.791. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 68.3 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.
Chippewa Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.2%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,958, a difference of 17.0%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,402, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $55,327, a difference of 2.8%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $94,466, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $91,357, a difference of 8.8%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income
Income MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$41,655
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$94,466
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$80,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Fair
$45,820
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$51,446
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$40,958
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Good
$52,631
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$89,856
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$91,357
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$55,327
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
19.3%

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 30.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
16.0%

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 66.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.93%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
22.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 41.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
30.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
71.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.9%

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
40.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
41.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
36.5%

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 151.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 78.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 58.0%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
23.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
76.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
40.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
13.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
4.3%

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.27%), college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
43.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
35.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.7%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 60.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chippewa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Average
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%