Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Immigrants from Thailand

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,682,640 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 6.4 Immigrants from Thailand.
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,327, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $97,400, a difference of 16.0%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $42,289, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,645, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,810, a difference of 10.9%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Income
Income MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Poor
$42,289
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Poor
$99,840
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Fair
$83,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Fair
$45,598
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Poor
$52,908
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Poor
$38,810
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$50,645
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Poor
$91,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Poor
$97,400
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Fair
$60,217
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
24.5%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 28.0%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
12.4%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.4%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.9%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 30.1%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
45.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Poor
32.8%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.12%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
6.9%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.76%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Fair
64.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.4%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.31%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability
Disability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Thailand
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%