Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Immigrants from Nepal

Fair
Good
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,240,673 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Immigrants from Nepal.
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,046, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $102,190, a difference of 21.7%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $104,966, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,611, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,843, a difference of 14.8%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Income
Income MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Good
$44,187
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Good
$104,966
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Good
$87,046
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Excellent
$47,925
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Good
$55,615
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Excellent
$40,704
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Good
$52,611
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Good
$95,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Good
$102,190
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Good
$61,843
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Excellent
24.9%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 40.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.4%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Excellent
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.6%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 96.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 66.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.6%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
68.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.0%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 44.2%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.17%), family households (62.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Poor
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
29.6%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.6%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 48.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.40%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
49.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
41.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 80.0%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 47.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability
Disability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Nepal
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%