Chippewa vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,138,868 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $99,093, a difference of 18.0%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $54,722, a difference of 18.0%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,003, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $57,975, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,436, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,672, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 38.7%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 58.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.0%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.060%), female disability (14.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.1%).