Chippewa vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,931,607 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 4.5 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $44,735, a difference of 20.4%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $78,249, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,539 compared to $68,461, a difference of 3.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $80,662, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $76,701, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 57.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 52.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 99.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 44.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.1%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and family households (62.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (43.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.4%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.4%).