Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,788,058 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.971. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 24.0 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 36.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,726, a difference of 18.5%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,773, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $56,495, a difference of 4.9%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $92,513, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $90,186, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 34.0%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 61.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 60.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 212.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 122.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 63.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 91.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 79.8%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 72.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.6%).