Chippewa vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,710,381 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 17.1 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $82,070, a difference of 16.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,911, a difference of 14.7%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $41,958, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $95,114, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.5%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 39.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.83%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 140.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 69.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 80.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 71.9%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.0%).