Chippewa vs Immigrants from Colombia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,451,111 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Colombia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from Colombia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,902, a difference of 18.9%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $42,971, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $97,290, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $57,658, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,913, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 49.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 38.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 30.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 30.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.83%), ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%).