Chippewa vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,485,591 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.3%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $83,618, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $51,888, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,665, a difference of 0.090%), median earnings ($40,287 compared to $40,195, a difference of 0.23%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $34,647, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 58.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 24.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.1%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 93.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.48%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.6%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.3%).