Chippewa vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Soviet Union

Fair
Good
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,515,682 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 22.2 Soviet Union.
Chippewa Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $54,202, a difference of 48.0%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $119,262, a difference of 37.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $63,382, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $62,848, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,340, a difference of 17.7%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricChippewaSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
24.2%

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 48.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaSoviet Union
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.1%

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 104.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 56.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaSoviet Union
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 39.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Good
83.0%

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 62.1%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaSoviet Union
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
26.3%

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 84.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 71.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 51.8%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
4.4%

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 89.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Chippewa vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 98.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 61.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Chippewa vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricChippewaSoviet Union
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%