Chippewa vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,220,737 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 179.6 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.6%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,625, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,038, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,027, a difference of 0.33%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $89,268, a difference of 2.8%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,040, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 36.9%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.76%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 36.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 71.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 50.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.8%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%).