Chippewa vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,830,690 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.243% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 243.1 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,557, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,472, a difference of 23.3%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,047, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,923, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,177, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.8%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 76.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 58.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 41.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 50.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.4%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%).