Chippewa vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,120,802 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $53,154, a difference of 45.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $98,008, a difference of 38.9%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $120,487, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,389, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $67,626, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 58.6%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.1%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 85.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 52.1%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.83%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 82.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 71.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.2%).