Chippewa vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,898,210 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,304, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $96,537, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $91,533, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $57,580, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $40,434, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 38.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 22.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 113.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.27%), college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.15%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 3.2%).