Chippewa vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Serbians

Fair
Excellent
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,209,207 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Serbians.
Chippewa Integration in Serbian Communities

Chippewa vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,551, a difference of 27.1%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $57,975, a difference of 25.0%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,572, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,106, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,087, a difference of 13.4%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Income
Income MetricChippewaSerbian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.7%

Chippewa vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 21.7%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaSerbian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Chippewa vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 83.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaSerbian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chippewa vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.4%

Chippewa vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.6%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaSerbian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Good
30.7%

Chippewa vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Poor
6.0%

Chippewa vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Chippewa vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Chippewa vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaSerbian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%