Chippewa vs Indonesian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Indonesian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Indonesians

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,685
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
247th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Indonesian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,589,030 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indonesians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Indonesians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Indonesians.
Chippewa Integration in Indonesian Communities

Chippewa vs Indonesian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.9%), median earnings ($40,287 compared to $41,701, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $72,856, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $79,543, a difference of 0.58%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,176, a difference of 0.61%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $84,890, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Income
Income MetricChippewaIndonesian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$37,300
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$88,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$72,856
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$41,701
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$47,503
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$36,140
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$45,566
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$79,543
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$84,890
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$54,176
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
22.7%

Chippewa vs Indonesian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.4%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.78%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaIndonesian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
22.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
24.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
32.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.9%

Chippewa vs Indonesian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaIndonesian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.5%

Chippewa vs Indonesian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.98%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaIndonesian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
40.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.5%

Chippewa vs Indonesian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 21.8%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (43.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and family households (62.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.97%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaIndonesian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
61.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
43.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
35.0%

Chippewa vs Indonesian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.1%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaIndonesian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
10.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
6.0%

Chippewa vs Indonesian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 96.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaIndonesian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
90.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
88.6%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
86.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
82.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
55.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
41.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
33.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Chippewa vs Indonesian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 63.2%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.55%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%).
Chippewa vs Indonesian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaIndonesian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
24.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%