Chippewa vs Costa Rican Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Costa Rican
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Costa Ricans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Costa Rican Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,337,683 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.885. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 10.0 Costa Ricans.
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,262, a difference of 23.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $102,779, a difference of 22.4%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,090, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,106, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,622, a difference of 13.2%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Good $44,090 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Good $103,989 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Excellent $87,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Average $46,645 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Average $54,279 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Average $39,622 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,106 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Good $95,565 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Good $102,779 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Good $61,638 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Good 25.3% |
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Average 9.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Good 16.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Good 16.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Average 29.0% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Average 11.6% |
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Poor 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Good 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Average 5.5% |
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Average 82.8% |
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.7%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Fair 32.7% |
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.14%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 56.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 91.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Fair 58.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Fair 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Average 37.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 15.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chippewa vs Costa Rican Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.4%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Costa Rican |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Excellent 22.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |