Chippewa vs Cajun Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Cajun
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Cajuns
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cajun Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,248,361 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Cajuns.
Chippewa vs Cajun Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 35.6%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $52,325, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $51,397, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,539 compared to $70,605, a difference of 0.090%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $87,157, a difference of 0.35%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $83,015, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $37,527 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $87,157 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $70,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $42,189 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Poor $52,325 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $34,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $45,338 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $82,393 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $83,015 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $51,397 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 33.9% |
Chippewa vs Cajun Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.7%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.9% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 25.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 24.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 22.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 40.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Chippewa vs Cajun Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chippewa vs Cajun Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 78.1% |
Chippewa vs Cajun Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.9%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.84%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Excellent 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Average 46.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 41.0% |
Chippewa vs Cajun Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 0.81%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 57.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chippewa vs Cajun Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 57.3%, a difference of 9.2%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 89.1% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 87.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 82.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 57.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 37.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 29.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chippewa vs Cajun Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.47%), male disability (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.96%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Cajun |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 50.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |