Chippewa vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Yakama
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,043,313 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Yakama.
Chippewa vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,321, a difference of 15.5%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $33,009, a difference of 11.0%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,539 compared to $72,225, a difference of 2.4%), median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,107, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $45,002, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Chippewa vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 64.7%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 21.4% |
Chippewa vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 101.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 82.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Chippewa vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
Chippewa vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.4%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 40.3% |
Chippewa vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 70.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 44.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Chippewa vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 117.2%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chippewa vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 88.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Yakama |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |