Chippewa vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,111,274 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $103,145, a difference of 46.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $121,444, a difference of 44.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $113,701, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 12.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,800, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $44,911, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 76.9%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 69.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 105.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 61.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.49%), family households (62.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 77.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%).