Chippewa vs British West Indian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
British West Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

British West Indians

Fair
Tragic
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
938
SOCIAL INDEX
6.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
333rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

British West Indian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,690,375 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 7.0 British West Indians.
Chippewa Integration in British West Indian Communities

Chippewa vs British West Indian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,299, a difference of 15.1%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $44,552, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $85,571, a difference of 1.9%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $88,987, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $51,463, a difference of 4.6%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Income
Income MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$40,330
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$88,987
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$75,647
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$44,552
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$49,636
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Good
$40,299
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Fair
$51,844
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$85,565
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$85,571
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$51,463
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
18.0%

Chippewa vs British West Indian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 33.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
21.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
22.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
17.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
17.9%

Chippewa vs British West Indian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 60.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
24.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.6%

Chippewa vs British West Indian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 50.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
29.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
70.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.2%

Chippewa vs British West Indian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
38.3%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
39.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
38.0%

Chippewa vs British West Indian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 214.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 119.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 28.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 61.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 88.0%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
29.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
70.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
35.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
11.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
3.5%

Chippewa vs British West Indian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 66.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
90.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
88.5%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
85.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
82.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
59.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
42.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
34.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs British West Indian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 89.8%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.54%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Chippewa vs British West Indian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaBritish West Indian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.99%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
24.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%