Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Panama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Panama
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Panama Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,820,672 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Panama.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,873, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $41,853, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $45,198, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $56,944, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,278, a difference of 9.1%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Poor $41,853 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $95,647 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $80,873 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Poor $45,198 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $51,962 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Fair $39,049 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $51,278 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $89,451 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $93,815 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $56,944 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.4%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Poor 14.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 29.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 72.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 34.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Average 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 44.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 34.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 85.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 51.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 63.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Poor 44.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Poor 36.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Panama |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Fair 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |