Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Panama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Immigrants from Panama

Fair
Poor
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Panama Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,820,672 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Panama.
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,873, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $41,853, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $45,198, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $56,944, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,278, a difference of 9.1%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Income
Income MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Poor
$41,853
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$95,647
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$80,873
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Poor
$45,198
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$51,962
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Fair
$39,049
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$51,278
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$89,451
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$93,815
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$56,944
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
23.4%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.4%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
29.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.6%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 72.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
34.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
82.2%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
44.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
34.2%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.4%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
14.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
57.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Poor
36.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Panama Disability
Disability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Panama
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%