Chippewa vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Tsimshian
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,951,147 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.183% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 183.4 Tsimshian.
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $97,809, a difference of 22.3%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,346, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $101,543, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $58,202, a difference of 8.1%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 79.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.8%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 101.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 77.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 5.6% |
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 77.4% |
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.8%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 42.2% |
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |