Chippewa vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,279,060 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 73.2 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $89,010, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,173, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $97,329, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.55%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,871, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,988, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 53.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 77.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 34.0%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.31, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (43.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 53.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%).