Chippewa vs Paiute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,913,129 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Paiute within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.334% in Paiute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2,334.5 Paiute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,743, a difference of 10.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $82,984, a difference of 3.7%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $47,991, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,762, a difference of 0.16%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $37,066, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $82,629, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 52.5%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.20%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.8%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 107.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.010%), female disability (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.4%).