Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,156,801 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,213, a difference of 26.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,388, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,412, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,440, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,353, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 42.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.0%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 82.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%).