Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Micronesia
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,432,750 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.026% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 2,025.5 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,000, a difference of 13.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,691, a difference of 7.8%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $75,574, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $80,544, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,477, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $47,177, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $37,464 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $90,345 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $75,574 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $41,133 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $47,177 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $35,477 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $50,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $80,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $87,864 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Average $61,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.5%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.91%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 5.6% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 29.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Fair 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 44.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Poor 32.9% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Fair 55.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 20.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 54.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 40.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 87.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.96%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |