Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,353,826 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $89,100, a difference of 26.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,705, a difference of 23.5%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,220, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,680, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,297, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 38.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 78.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 39.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.87%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%).