Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Tohono O'odham

Fair
Tragic
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,555,814 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 24.7 Tohono O'odham.
Chippewa Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $30,256, a difference of 21.1%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $72,193, a difference of 20.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $39,543, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $45,248, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $33,205, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $49,121, a difference of 9.6%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
22.1%

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 106.3%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 81.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 23.8%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
21.5%

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 58.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 55.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.9%

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 40.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.1%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
75.1%

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 23.7%), currently married (43.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
49.8%

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 65.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.3%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 29.6%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability (14.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricChippewaTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%