Chippewa vs British Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
British
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
British
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
British Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,324,227 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of British within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 British.
Chippewa vs British Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,571, a difference of 27.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $106,264, a difference of 26.6%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,914, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,477, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,772, a difference of 13.6%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 15.7%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | British |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $46,571 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $108,705 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $88,914 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $48,189 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $57,890 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Average $39,772 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Poor $51,477 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Excellent $98,359 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $106,264 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $63,940 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.9% |
Chippewa vs British Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 50.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.8%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | British |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Average 29.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chippewa vs British Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 76.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | British |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chippewa vs British Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | British |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 40.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 76.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Fair 82.6% |
Chippewa vs British Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.7%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 38.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | British |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Good 30.8% |
Chippewa vs British Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | British |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 92.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 60.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Chippewa vs British Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 45.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | British |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 87.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 62.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 40.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chippewa vs British Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | British |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |