Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from the Azores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from the Azores
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,520,533 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from the Azores.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $92,322, a difference of 15.4%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $53,503, a difference of 15.4%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,357, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $52,121, a difference of 3.3%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,608, a difference of 8.1%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $39,608 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $95,402 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $80,357 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Fair $45,812 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Fair $53,503 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $38,573 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Good $52,621 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Fair $92,322 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $94,138 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $52,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 55.3%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Fair 16.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Excellent 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 32.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 41.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 80.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.5%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.27%), currently married (43.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 45.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 39.6% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.26%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Excellent 56.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 85.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 93.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 92.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 90.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 89.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 87.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 85.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 82.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 54.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 35.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 27.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from the Azores |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 50.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |