Chippewa vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,188,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 63.2 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,997, a difference of 20.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $82,560, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $96,086, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $56,975, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,302, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 37.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.90%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.9%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%).