Chippewa vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,466,283 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.283% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 283.5 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 54.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $44,822, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $72,093, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,287 compared to $38,949, a difference of 3.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $77,044, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $44,356, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 43.3%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 42.2%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 9.2%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.69%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 54.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 59.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.2%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.69%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.5%).