Chippewa vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,074,489 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $119,496, a difference of 49.4%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $105,262, a difference of 49.2%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $53,874, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $58,239, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $70,238, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 74.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 61.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 111.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 37.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 68.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 90.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 88.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 87.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 69.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%).