Chippewa vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,448,591 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,714, a difference of 16.4%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,722, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $55,394, a difference of 2.9%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $94,665, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $92,208, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.6%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), poverty (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 50.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 45.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 38.0%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 172.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 94.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 22.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 47.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 71.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 120.4%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.3%).