Chippewa vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,986,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 32.1 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.9%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $75,839, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $84,258, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,498, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $38,120, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,254, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 100.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 58.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 53.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.24%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.29%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%).